[PD] Cyclone in vanilla?

Enrique Erne enrique at netpd.org
Thu Apr 24 08:25:17 CEST 2008


or [biquad~ 0 0 0 1]

eni



Miller Puckette wrote:
> I believe z~ is just rzero~ 0.
> 
> cheers
> Miller
> 
> On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 11:24:34AM +0200, Frank Barknecht wrote:
>> Hallo,
>> Matt Barber hat gesagt: // Matt Barber wrote:
>>
>>> Actually, for those of us who insist on vanilla and do everything with
>>> expr/expr~/fexpr~ or abstractions, is it possible to implement [z~] in
>>> fexpr~ for a delay larger than its vector size?  You could do it with
>>> an abstraction using [delwrite~] and [delread~], setting the [block~]
>>> to 1, and then set the delay as a ratio to the [samplerate~] -- the
>>> difficulty in making it work correctly here is setting the size of the
>>> [delwrite~] efficiently (this could maybe be done with a loadbang
>>> routine that would send a message to a subpatch in the abstraction
>>> instance to add and connect a delwrite~ with the proper delay
>>> allocation...).
>> You don't need to set the block~-size to 1, and personally I would
>> just make the delwrite~ "big enough". It's cheap to store things in a
>> delay. But anyway, attached is a z~-clone with delwrite~/delread~ that
>> uses a helper abstraction created dynamically.
>>
>> Ciao
>> -- 
>>  Frank Barknecht                                     _ ______footils.org__
> 
> 
> 
> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> PD-list at iem.at mailing list
>> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> PD-list at iem.at mailing list
> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
> 





More information about the Pd-list mailing list