[PD] update on declare

[Hans-Christoph Steiner]

Please add that info to your bug report, so we can keep track of the  
status of things.

Thanks!

.hc

On May 4, 2008, at 5:21 PM, marius schebella wrote:

> hi,
> I just realized that I made some mistakes in the past and that declare
> actually is working better than I thought. here is what I forgot:
> 1) declare only takes effect when you open the patch. stupid, I  
> think I
> read it, but... Some alleged "bugs" were caused by the assumption that
> it is enough to create a declare object and paths will be set...
> 2) no absolute paths! absolute paths work for -lib, but not for
> -path/-stdpath. at least on OS X it is not possible to set absolute
> paths (or at least I don't know how), all paths have to be relative to
> Pd (-stdpath) or to the patch (-path).
>
> this means that declare becomes totally useful (for pd version 0.41  
> and up).
>
> three more questions remain:
> how can I set absolute paths?
> Is the behaviour for abstractions cleared?
> and what is the order in which paths are searched for object classes?
>
> marius.
>
> _______________________________________________
> PD-list at iem.at mailing list
> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/ 
> listinfo/pd-list




------------------------------------------------------------------------ 
----

                             kill your television