[PD] inlet and inlet~

Miller Puckette mpuckett at imusic1.ucsd.edu
Tue May 6 16:09:32 CEST 2008

No... I hope to figure out a good way to permit that.  Meanwhile, there's
also a bug in that inlet~ doesn't take numbers "correctly" (doesn't
promote them to signals)


On Tue, May 06, 2008 at 10:07:04AM -0400, Matt Barber wrote:
> Hello,
> Is there a way to make an abstraction that has one inlet that takes
> both signal and control messages (like osc~, e.g., or fiddle~ which
> gets audio and setting info, etc.)?  It's part of the API for objects;
> it seems to me there ought to be a way to do this with abstractions as
> well.  I'm envisioning an inlet object that splits signal and control
> into two outlets which can be parsed from there.  Something that uses
> the signal and control values to do the same thing (as in osc~) might
> be difficult to implement in an abstraction, but having signal and
> optional settings messages go to the same inlet would add to the
> abstraction-as-object nature of PD... does it exist?
> Thanks,
> Matt
> _______________________________________________
> PD-list at iem.at mailing list
> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list

More information about the Pd-list mailing list