[PD] pdj in 0.40 and 0.41

marius schebella marius.schebella at gmail.com
Sat May 10 02:47:57 CEST 2008

Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
> The schedlib stuff was added in 0.41, it doesn't exist in 0.40, AFAIK.

pdj also runs without schedlib. -schedlib stuff is needed for gui 
elements and pascal has added a patch for osx that fixes the schedlib 
thing (osx_extsched_fix.patch), but I am not sure if it gets applied 
(would be cool if it would, but I don't think it is).
this is what pascal sent:
"... this patch has not yet been submitted to the pure-data dev list. 
This patch is only required if you are using Java AWT/Swing GUI elements 
within your Java code, otherwise everything will work fine. If you 
really need to use AWT, you will need a more recent version of pure-data 
that support the -schedlib option with OS X (and 0.40-3 only supports 
windows). While pd 0.41-2 added the support for OS X and Linux, there is 
still a small bug that crash pd when you are trying to load a external 
scheduler. The patch to this is in the source distribution of pdj and it 
needs to be applied to a pd 0.41-2 version."

but again, it should also run with 0.40.3 and hence with pd-extended...


> On May 6, 2008, at 6:01 PM, marius schebella wrote:
>> hi,
>> I am still not sure, why pdj is not working with pd-extended 0.40.3,
>> only with 0.41?
>> I also wanted to use the scheduler as mentioned int he pdj readme, but
>> none of the pd versions will start anymore with the -schedlib flag set.
>> am I missing libraries? I am on os x 10.5.
>> marius.
>> _______________________________________________
>> PD-list at iem.at mailing list
>> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> 
>> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- 
> All information should be free.  - the hacker ethic

More information about the Pd-list mailing list