[PD] drop out problem
padawan12 at obiwannabe.co.uk
Sun May 18 00:17:42 CEST 2008
On Sat, 17 May 2008 22:26:09 +0200
Roman Haefeli <reduzierer at yahoo.de> wrote:
> On Sat, 2008-05-17 at 21:01 +0100, Andy Farnell wrote:
> > On Sat, 17 May 2008 21:19:50 +0200
> > Roman Haefeli <reduzierer at yahoo.de> wrote:
> > > what do you consider many? i counted 8 [line~]s and 4 [vline~]s in the
> > > main patch. the main patch is using 10 instances of an abstraction, that
> > > has a [line~], so the sum of all is around 22 [line~] objects.
> > They are all audio rate (constant cost) so I don't see a problem either.
> > In the past I've noticed signal rate [line]
> do you actually mean a message base [line] here?
Sorry, that's what I meant.
> > can be a problem.
> yo, in my case, though i am not totally sure, it seems, that sending
> 'set' messages to [partconv~] too often causes trouble. i haven't
> checked the code, but i don't assume, that sending messages to [line~],
> [vline~] or [line] causes spikes in the cpu usage.
> btw: is there a way to monitor the cpu usage on a linux box at a very
> high rate, so that short spikes get visible? it would might help me
> figuring out, if the really 'set' messages to [partconv~] are causing
Using top with a combination of -b and -d options might help.
> Der frühe Vogel fängt den Wurm. Hier gelangen Sie zum neuen Yahoo! Mail: http://mail.yahoo.de
Use the source
More information about the Pd-list