[PD] call for testing on the nightly builds!

Hans-Christoph Steiner hans at eds.org
Mon May 19 20:06:46 CEST 2008

On May 19, 2008, at 6:04 PM, Enrique Erne wrote:

> Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
>> On May 17, 2008, at 12:02 PM, Enrique Erne wrote:
>>> Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
>>>> On May 13, 2008, at 10:06 AM, Enrique Erne wrote:
>>>>> Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
>>>>>> Hey all,
>>>>>> I've been fixing quite a lot of bugs in preparation of making  
>>>>>> the Pd- extended 0.40.3 release.  It's getting pretty much  
>>>>>> ready, so please  test it heavily so we can find any  
>>>>>> outstanding bugs!
>>>>>> Jack just pointed out that pdp on Mac OS X/PowerPC is having  
>>>>>> problems  loading videos, and is crashing, so I am working on  
>>>>>> that now.
>>>>> some objects can't create. i think that all of them are know  
>>>>> problems. for me not be able to use <~ and >~ is _most_  
>>>>> annoying (hexloader-something?). i know there are workarounds  
>>>>> with expr.
>>>>> not including iem-t3 lib is a loss but i can live without it.  
>>>>> thou it makes around 5 nice netpd patches not usable anymore.
>>>> You can now file bug reports from the Help menu in Pd-extended.  
>>>> Please file a bug report for this.
>>> i wrote a bug report for iem_t3
>>> i'm not sure about the hexloader. i found this:
>>> http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php? 
>>> func=detail&aid=1637460&group_id=55736&atid=478070 should i file  
>>> a new bug report?
>> hexloader should be included in tomorrow's build.  Please test  
>> it.  The t3 stuff should be in today's build.
> for some reason the osx i386 didn't build.
> http://autobuild.puredata.info/auto-build/2008-05-19/logs/ 
> 2008-05-19_03.15.00_darwin_macosx104-i386_pd-extended_run-automated- 
> builder.txt
> so i tested with Pd-0.40.3-extended-20080519-macosx104-powerpc in  
> Rosetta mode.
> it3_delay and the other t3's work!
> the hexloader seems to work too
> but [<~] is now doing a:
> load_object: Symbol "0x3e0x7e_setup" not found
>  expr~ $v1 > $v2
> ... couldn't create
> i don't understand the issue here. it seems to load an abstraction  
> 0x3c0x7e.pd with [expr~ $v1 > $v2] and expr~ somehow doesn't create.
> when i load a plain [expr~] it _can_ create. and after doing so  
> [<~] is working as well...
> should i file a bugreport for... uhm..
> expr or 0x3c0x7e.pd ?


> ----------------
> i found a new one in the Help/Search input field i can't write  
> anything.  should i file a bug report for this?

Is the leopard?  Feel free to file bug reports.


> eni



More information about the Pd-list mailing list