[PD] int - float confusion with OSC communication

Dan Wilcox danomatika at gmail.com
Tue May 20 20:12:44 CEST 2008


On Tue, 2008-05-20 at 14:13 +0200, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:

> > so it can wither away in a corner? Does it offer something that mrpeach 
> > doesn't?
> 
> well, you use only one object instead of two (but of course you can 
> build [dumpOSC]/[sendOSC] as abstractions with mrpeach's objects)
> i don't know any other "advantage"

One nice thing about sendOSC is that it does not complain to the console when
the recipient machine is not running, unlike udpsend.  I have some patches that forward OSC to
two machines, but when I'm testing one is not running and its annoying to have to go in and close
the udpsend.

> 
> fmgasdr.
> IOhannes
> 
> 

---
Dan Wilcox
robotcowboy.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/attachments/20080520/63b68733/attachment.htm>


More information about the Pd-list mailing list