[PD] [PD-dev] bang [block~] to query current blocksize

Charles Henry czhenry at gmail.com
Mon May 26 18:52:54 CEST 2008


On Mon, May 26, 2008 at 10:47 AM, Hans-Christoph Steiner <hans at eds.org> wrote:
>
> On May 26, 2008, at 9:09 AM, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
>
>> Frank Barknecht wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> exactly this is the kind of "kludge" i am talking about. i hope
>>>>> that "kludge" means something really bad and ugly, as this is how i
>>>>> use this word here.
>>>> You mean it's a kludge if there isn't a special object for this?
>>>
>>> The real problem is that it's global: I may not want all my [r pd]
>>> receivers to get activated every time something somewhere queries the
>>> state of DSP.
>>
>> yep.
>> a dedicated object does not have this problems.
>
> Hmm, for DSP state, that's global, so using a global receive symbol
> makes sense, IMHO.  For other things, perhaps you could use the patch
> receive name, is [receive pd-mypatch.pd].

Also, you could make an explicitly local dsp state query with a little
[spigot] magic, just filtering the message.  However, it would also
trigger a message from every global state reciever that is not
filtered out.

Chuck

>
> .hc
>
>
>>
>>
>> fgamsdr
>> IOhannes
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> PD-dev mailing list
>> PD-dev at iem.at
>> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> ----
>
> News is what people want to keep hidden and everything else is
> publicity.          - Bill Moyers
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> PD-dev mailing list
> PD-dev at iem.at
> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev
>




More information about the Pd-list mailing list