[PD] gem2pdp

[ydegoyon]

Roman Haefeli wrote:
> On Sun, 2008-05-25 at 14:11 +0200, yves degoyon wrote:
>
>   
>> in fact, it seems that all rendering in single-buffer mode
>> doesn't work ( see attached patch for testing )
>> and, as the pixels capture only works in single-buffer mode,
>> all objects depending on it fail,
>> including gem2pdp, pix_write and pix_snap.
>>     
>
> if i am not totally mistaken (or misunderstanding the underlying concept
> of Gem), i used to use [pix_snap] or [pix_write] in double buffer mode.
> it's just a matter of correct order to get expected results.
> what makes you think, that those classes only work in single buffer
> mode?
>   
nothing 'makes me think',
that's what i get with the attached
test patch, gem from cvs
on an nvidia 7000

sevy
> roman
>
>
>
> 		
> ___________________________________________________________ 
> Telefonate ohne weitere Kosten vom PC zum PC: http://messenger.yahoo.de
>
>
>   

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/attachments/20080527/ea326357/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed...
Name: gem-buffer.pd
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/attachments/20080527/ea326357/attachment.txt>