[PD] [PD-announce] Gem-0.91.0 released

[Steffen Juul]

On 04/06/2008, at 8.35, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:

> Steffen Juul wrote:
>> On 02/06/2008, at 14.25, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
>>> if you (or anybody else) finds more bugs till tomorrow
>> Has something happened to [pix_data] since
>> GEM: ver: 0.91-cvs
>> GEM: compiled: May 21 2008
>> ? (I can't see anything in the Changelog.)
>> I have a patch that uses that where the output is very different   
>> between the two versions.
>
>
> yes, [pix_data] is believed to be kind of fixed...at least it used  
> to be.
> ah, looking at your compile date, it might indeed be that it was  
> broken again when fixing [pix_mask] and so on...
>
> still, it would be nice if you could elaborate on the differences...

Sure. I should have supplied that from the start. Attached.

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: colortest.pd
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 1610 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/attachments/20080604/c9b29d83/attachment.obj>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: testbild.png
Type: image/png
Size: 4592 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/attachments/20080604/c9b29d83/attachment.png>