[PD] better tabread4~

[Roman Haefeli]

On Wed, 2008-06-11 at 00:05 +0200, cyrille henry wrote:

> i can understand that tabread4~ minimise the error when the table is large (when you play it faster than the original speed).
> but with a small table, or when you play it slower, the first derivative discontinuity create lot's of high frequency.

hm... several times i had the impression, i used [tabread~] instead of
[tabread4~] because of the high frequencies, that are audible, even if
the sample is played very slowly. i assume, those come from the
discontinuites you mentioned. but when i compared to [tabread~], there
was definitely a huge difference. however, just out of curiosity, i
wonder, whether a different algorithm is optimal for playing faster than
original than for playing slower. 

i am looking forward to check your classes.

roman


		
___________________________________________________________ 
Telefonate ohne weitere Kosten vom PC zum PC: http://messenger.yahoo.de