[PD] better tabread4~
mpuckett at imusic1.ucsd.edu
Wed Jun 11 22:51:59 CEST 2008
I'm interested in this too... I'm deep inside something else right now
but will check this out when I can.
On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 02:23:11PM +0200, cyrille henry wrote:
> ok, if you don't wish to compile in order to test, here are 2 samples :
> note that this is the worst case for tabread4~ : a very small table play at low frequency.
> for bigger table, the difference can be very small.
> here is a picture of the patch used to make this samples :
> Andy Farnell a ?crit :
> > I'm really looking forward to giving this the 'ear test'.
> > Maybe I'm growing old but differerences in interpolation
> > methods are very subtle to my perception. What would be the
> > hard case to test it? It would be when the signal is greatly
> > transposed, right?
> > Remember when I tested your stab at sinc interpolation Charles,
> > I honestly couldn't hear an big difference, there was one, but
> > hard to define.
> > Andy
> Pd-list at iem.at mailing list
> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
More information about the Pd-list