[PD] better tabread4~

Miller Puckette mpuckett at imusic1.ucsd.edu
Wed Jun 11 22:51:59 CEST 2008


I'm interested in this too... I'm deep inside something else right now
but will check this out when I can.

cheers
M

On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 02:23:11PM +0200, cyrille henry wrote:
> ok, if you don't wish to compile in order to test, here are 2 samples :
> 
> http://www.chdh.free.fr/tab/tabosc4.wav
> http://www.chdh.free.fr/tab/tabosc4c.wav
> 
> note that this is the worst case for tabread4~ : a very small table play at low frequency.
> 
> for bigger table, the difference can be very small.
> here is a picture of the patch used to make this samples : 
> http://www.chdh.free.fr/tab/patch.jpg
> 
> cyrille
> 
> 
> Andy Farnell a ?crit :
> > 
> > I'm really looking forward to giving this the 'ear test'.
> > 
> > Maybe I'm growing old but differerences in interpolation 
> > methods are very subtle to my perception. What would be the
> > hard case to test it? It would be when the signal is greatly
> > transposed, right?
> > 
> > Remember when I tested your stab at sinc interpolation Charles,
> > I honestly couldn't hear an big difference, there was one, but
> > hard to define.
> > 
> > Andy 
> > 
> > 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Pd-list at iem.at mailing list
> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list




More information about the Pd-list mailing list