[PD] Avoiding clips

[Kyle Klipowicz]

Am I missing something or wouldn't it be simplest to add a quick and dirty 5
ms or so fade in/out envelope that follows the timing of the array triggers?

~Kyle

On Fri, Jun 6, 2008 at 12:17 PM, Andy Farnell <padawan12 at obiwannabe.co.uk>
wrote:

>
> Hi Lau,
>
> I guess you're building a beat concatenator so you have no
> room for introducing timing offsets.
>
> First, termminology - let's not call these "clips", I think
> discontinuities is a better word.
>
> Your first solution is similar to what is being discussed in another
> thread on dynamic delays - Millers "rendezvous" algorithm where
> the two segments are spliced via a DC offset introduced by a ramp.
>
> The second one really amounts to crossfading or short window
> average filter. Further, how can you
> be sure your detector won't have a false positive from a fast
> signal slew  rate?
>
> If my assumption is right then for simplicity I suggest
> revising your constraints. A 64 sample crossfade will introduce
> negligable timing problems.
>
>
> --
> Use the source
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pd-list at iem.at mailing list
> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
>



-- 
-----
------------
   ----     -----
---- -------- - ------
http://perhapsidid.wordpress.com
http://myspace.com/kyleklipowicz
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/attachments/20080613/b31412f3/attachment.htm>