[PD] Abstractions search path hirarchy (was: pduino-arduino trouble)
abonnements at revolwear.com
Sun Jun 15 09:55:08 CEST 2008
i don't konw if that's related. i was using the release candidate: Pd
wouldn't it make sense if Pd would search first in the same directory
as the patch is for abstractions?
Am 2008-06-14 um 23:05 schrieb Hans-Christoph Steiner:
> Yeah, that was my mistake, I removed hardware/arduino.pd from the
> nightly builds since it shouldn't be there. Sorry about that...
> On Jun 14, 2008, at 11:59 AM, Max Neupert wrote:
>> hi list,
>> i found the source of my problem here.
>> the patch was using the [arduino] abstraction.
>> i had it located in the same path than my patch (version 0.3), but
>> another one (version 0.4) is located in
>> i've always assumed that pd searches for abstractions first in the
>> same directory than the patch is found. that doesn't seem to be the
>> for some reason pd sometimes choose to prefer the 0.4 version which
>> has a different, non working bitrate set.
>> i've deleted the abstraction and use it now in a subpatch instead, so
>> i am sure no other version is loaded instead.
>> Am 2008-06-13 um 18:54 schrieb Claude Heiland-Allen:
>>> Max Neupert wrote:
>>>> this is the output when it does work:
>>>> set_baudrate baudbits: 57600
>>>> this is the output when it doesn't:
>>>> set_baudrate baudbits: 115200
>>>> anyone has a clue what's going on?
>>> I'm guessing the baudbits has something to do with it. Maybe
>>> something along the connection between pd and arduino doesn't
>>> support the higher speed.
>>> Never used arduino or any other serial devices though.
>> Pd-list at iem.at mailing list
>> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/
> The arc of history bends towards justice. - Dr. Martin Luther
> King, Jr.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 186 bytes
Desc: Signierter Teil der Nachricht
More information about the Pd-list