[PD] Abstractions search path hirarchy (was: pduino-arduino trouble)

Roman Haefeli reduzierer at yahoo.de
Sun Jun 15 19:11:30 CEST 2008

On Sun, 2008-06-15 at 18:53 +0200, Frank Barknecht wrote:
> Hallo,
> Roman Haefeli hat gesagt: // Roman Haefeli wrote:
> > the actual behaviour shouldn't be changed. afaik, it is not possible to
> > shadow classes of pd or from binary libraries. changing actual behaviour
> > would lead to many incosistencies, where sometimes an local abstraction
> > would shadow library classes and sometimes not. internal classes
> > couldn't be shadowed anyway. it would make the pd-world definitely more
> > troublesome. unless it is possible to shadow EVERYTHING (classes from
> > binary libraries and internals), this shouldn't be changed, IMO. 
> Btw.: Miller is working on making shadowing even builtins possible.
> Check pd-dev, unless you've already seen it.

oh, thanks. i usually read pd-dev, but obviously i missed the point

it seems you're coming up with this at the right time, so forget my
concerns ;-) sorry for the noise.


Telefonate ohne weitere Kosten vom PC zum PC: http://messenger.yahoo.de

More information about the Pd-list mailing list