[PD] GEM pix_buffer question

[Hans-Christoph Steiner]

My guess is because pix_buffer stores uncompressed frames, which are  
much bigger.  But I could be wrong.

.hc

On Jun 23, 2008, at 6:18 PM, rainer _ wrote:

> Hi,
> just have rebuilt one of my patches to fetch single videoframes not  
> from harddisc but from RAM with the pix_buffer objects. It works  
> great, about 20 times faster - the problem is I can`t load more  
> than 960 frames of Quicktime DV PAL in RAM and the 2 GB of RAM are  
> full.... this is strange because the hole file of about 4 min. has  
> about 500 MB.
>
> Any idea why?
>
>  GEM Vers. 0.90 on WinXP
>
> thanks,
> Rainer
>
> Connect to the next generation of MSN Messenger  Get it now!
> _______________________________________________
> Pd-list at iem.at mailing list
> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/ 
> listinfo/pd-list





------------------------------------------------------------------------ 
----

"[T]he greatest purveyor of violence in the world today [is] my own  
government." - Martin Luther King, Jr.



-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/attachments/20080623/7800d2a0/attachment.htm>