[PD] raw resampling

Matt Barber brbrofsvl at gmail.com
Tue Jul 1 01:11:23 CEST 2008


D'oh!  Re-replying with the right subject.  =o(

On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 5:41 PM, Matt Barber <brbrofsvl at gmail.com> wrote:
> You can see the attached patch if you want linear interpolation and
> can stand a little delay.  More intricate interpolations (any of the
> cubic ones posted in the [tabread4~] thread, e.g.) can be done in this
> way at the expense of more processing and longer delay.
>
>
> Matt
>
>
>> Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2008 18:10:46 +0200
>> From: Atte Andr? Jensen <atte.jensen at gmail.com>
>> Subject: Re: [PD] raw resampling
>> To: Claude Heiland-Allen <claudiusmaximus at goto10.org>
>> Cc: pure data <pd-list at iem.at>
>> Message-ID: <48690586.7010300 at gmail.com>
>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
>>
>> Claude Heiland-Allen wrote:
>>
>>> in~     [phasor~ 4410]
>>>  |       |
>>> [samphold~]
>>>  |
>>> out~
>>
>> Ah, of course!
>>
>>> Note: this doesn't change the sample rate, but resamples the signal at
>>> 4410Hz. Not sure if this is what you want, but it's what I use if I want
>>> lots of aliasing...
>>
>> I didn't really expect to have a signal at 4410. Would that have any
>> benefits, for instance with regards to performance?
>>
>> Basically I (like you) just want to hear some alias noise!
>>
>> --
>> peace, love & harmony
>> Atte
>>
>> http://atte.dk       | http://myspace.com/attejensen
>> http://anagrammer.dk | http://modlys.dk
>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: samphold_lin~.pd
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 848 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/attachments/20080630/38c592ec/attachment.obj>


More information about the Pd-list mailing list