[PD] extremely stupid question: playing sample

hard off hard.off at gmail.com
Fri Jul 4 10:29:16 CEST 2008

oops, my mistake.

here's the patch which i based my faulty logic on,  and in hindsight all it
proves is that signals are delayed one block before affecting the phasor's
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/attachments/20080704/8b5e25e7/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: phasor-rate.pd
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 558 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/attachments/20080704/8b5e25e7/attachment.obj>

More information about the Pd-list mailing list