[PD] better tabread4~

[Charles Henry]

On Sat, Jul 5, 2008 at 1:42 PM, Matt Barber <brbrofsvl at gmail.com> wrote:
> Chuck, thanks for the explanation!  One question about this -- would
> working back from the spectrum possibly mean that you wouldn't
> necessarily match any of the points (would this mean you could say the
> impulse response would not have a value of 1 at t=0)?  This would be
> an interesting proposition, and maybe it might help temper the
> tendency of polynomial interpolation to deliver values >1 or <-1 when
> the curve has a maximum or minimum between samples?  I'm not sure if
> that would be the result, but I like the sentiment.  =o)

Yes, there are some situations where we could construct something that
looks good on the face of things, but actually behaves poorly.
However, there are a number of free variables involved.  I will try to
work through an example (so that I can figure it out).


>
> Anyway, thanks again.
>
> Matt
>