[PD] pdlua also into vanilla?
Hans-Christoph Steiner
hans at eds.org
Fri Jul 18 17:43:06 CEST 2008
As a test yes, but not for the release. It's changing too fast right
now to maintain backwards compatibility, so including it would cause
more problems than it would solve.
I just had a thought: how about replacing Tcl/Tk with Lua/Tk? Just a
thought...
.hc
On Jul 18, 2008, at 10:53 AM, mark edward grimm wrote:
> i was looking at this too this morning...
>
> wasn't pdlua in pd-extended once? or am i mistaken...
>
> maybe that was an old build prior to 10.5 autobuild?
>
> thanks!
> mark
>
>
>
> --- On Fri, 7/18/08, marius schebella <marius.schebella at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> From: marius schebella <marius.schebella at gmail.com>
>> Subject: [PD] pdlua also into vanilla?
>> To: "pd-list at iem.at" <pd-list at iem.at>
>> Date: Friday, July 18, 2008, 9:41 AM
>> hi,
>> frank suggested this already,
>> http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/2008-03/060081.html
>> I'd
>> like to support the idea of shipping pdlua as closely as
>> possible with
>> vanilla (frank suggested a status like [expr]).
>> right now pdlua is not even in pdx, which I hope can still
>> be added?
>> marius.
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Pd-list at iem.at mailing list
>> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
>> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pd-list at iem.at mailing list
> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/
> listinfo/pd-list
------------------------------------------------------------------------
----
If nature has made any one thing less susceptible than all others of
exclusive property, it is the action of the thinking power called an
idea, which an individual may exclusively possess as long as he keeps
it to himself; but the moment it is divulged, it forces itself into
the possession of everyone, and the receiver cannot dispossess
himself of it. - Thomas Jefferson
More information about the Pd-list
mailing list