[PD] pdlua also into vanilla?

marius schebella marius.schebella at gmail.com
Sat Jul 19 16:40:43 CEST 2008

Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
> As a test yes, but not for the release.  It's changing too fast right 
> now to maintain backwards compatibility, so including it would cause 
> more problems than it would solve.

I am not sure, if it really changes, or if it only adds new features. I 
think the big problems (file naming, loader) are solved, but not sure.
I worked a lot with py/pyext and pdj in the past (which are also 
candidates for pdx), but pdlua is the only scripting tool that can 
easily integrate the language as a static library, because it is so 
small. maintainance should be easier than with python and java.

> I just had a thought: how about replacing Tcl/Tk with Lua/Tk?  Just a 
> thought...

is this just a matter of replacing one with the other, or does this mean 
every graphical part has to be rewritten?


More information about the Pd-list mailing list