[PD] dumpOSC problems "couldn't create"

[Jack]

OK, i will try 'killall pd' next time.
Thanx Hans.
++

Jack

Le 20 juil. 08 à 19:13, Hans-Christoph Steiner a écrit :

>
> On Jul 19, 2008, at 7:24 PM, Jack wrote:
>
>>
>> Le 19 juil. 08 à 17:25, zmoelnig at iem.at a écrit :
>>
>>> Quoting Claude Heiland-Allen <claudiusmaximus at goto10.org>:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> [dumpOSC 5555] needs to be able to bind to network port 5555, if
>>>> something else is already using it (or if the previous user of the
>>>> port
>>>> hasn't timed out completely) then dumpOSC will fail to create.
>>>
>>> which btw, is by design and not a bug.
>>> it is the very same behaviour as the [netreceive] object has.
>> This is a real problem with [netreceive]. For example when Pd crash,
>> if you open your last patch, Pd can't create your [netreceive] with
>> the same port. Is it possible to force to close connection on this
>> port to solve the problem ?
>
> Try running 'killall pd' to make sure there isn't a hung pd process  
> still running.  Otherwise, you have to wait for the OS to free the  
> network port.  That's not a pd-specific problem, but network  
> sockets in general.
>
> .hc
>
>
>
>> ++
>>
>> Jack
>>
>>
>>>
>>> and before i forget it: have i already said that i would advice
>>> everybody to _not_ use [dumpOSC] (as part of the OSCx library) and
>>> instead use mrpeach's [udpreceive] and [unpackOSC]?
>>>
>>> fadrm
>>> IOhannes
>>>
>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------
>>> This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Pd-list at iem.at mailing list
>>> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/
>>> listinfo/pd-list
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Pd-list at iem.at mailing list
>> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/ 
>> listinfo/pd-list
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- 
> ------
>
> Terrorism is not an enemy.  It cannot be defeated.  It's a tactic.   
> It's about as sensible to say we declare war on night attacks and  
> expect we're going to win that war.  We're not going to win the war  
> on terrorism.        - retired U.S. Army general, William Odom
>
>