[PD] variables in throw~

[IOhannes m zmoelnig]

Atte André Jensen wrote:
> Claude Heiland-Allen wrote:
> 
>> Should be in the help patch for throw~, otherwise file a bug report.
> 
> Thanks everyone for the input, I've got something to work with. I now 
> realize my question came out all wrong, I'm perfectly aware of the 
> difference between dac~ and throw~, I was just wondering if there's a 
> greater logic behind the fact that throw~ accepts set messages? Can 
> anything general be said about which objects accepts set-messages?

no.
which messages an object supports is entirely up to the object itself.
even though Pd's code has rudimentary implementation of an 
object-oriented inheritance concept, this is only used in a few special 
cases.

there are 3 ways to find out which objects accept a "set" message:
- read the help-patch
- read the source
- send a "set" message to the object and see what it does

fgmasdr
IOhannes'