[PD] 'pure' pd DSP abstractions wanted!
enrique at netpd.org
Sun Aug 24 16:42:55 CEST 2008
Jamie Bullock wrote:
> On Sun, 2008-08-24 at 09:54 -0400, Enrique Erne wrote:
>> Hi Jamie
>> It's not much but might be helpful to port other stuff to purepd.
>> you'll find
>> gt~.pd (>~)
>> lt~.pd (<~)
> That's great actually, and I'd love to contribute back into this.
> However, if I'm not mistaked aren't there two purepd projects
> netpd/purepd and Hans's purepd in pd svn? Would it be worth feeding your
> patches into Hans's, and then any other abstractions I make/find I can
> also feed into svn?
> Sorry if this has already come up...
feel free to use the abstractions. if i can help with purepd i will
certainly do. maybe we could include the filter abstractions that came
up a while ago on the pd-list?
More information about the Pd-list