[PD] 'pure' pd DSP abstractions wanted!

zmoelnig at iem.at zmoelnig at iem.at
Tue Aug 26 03:29:15 CEST 2008

Quoting Jamie Bullock <jamie at postlude.co.uk>:

> On Sun, 2008-08-24 at 09:54 -0400, Enrique Erne wrote:
>> Hi Jamie
>> It's not much but might be helpful to port other stuff to purepd.
>> you'll find
>> gt~.pd (>~)
>> lt~.pd (<~)
>> sgn~.pd
>> http://www.netpd.org/eni/purepd/
> That's great actually, and I'd love to contribute back into this.
> However, if I'm not mistaked aren't there two purepd projects
> netpd/purepd and Hans's purepd in pd svn? Would it be worth feeding your
> patches into Hans's, and then any other abstractions I make/find I can
> also feed into svn?

just out of curiosity: >~.pd, <~.pd, sgn~ and what else in zexy are  
already pd-vanilla abstractions (some of them are both abstractions  
and externals for performance reasons); is there an advantage in  
collecting these things in yet another arbitrary (as opposed to  
grouped by functionality) library?


This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.

More information about the Pd-list mailing list