[PD] 'pure' pd DSP abstractions wanted!

[zmoelnig at iem.at]

Quoting Jamie Bullock <jamie at postlude.co.uk>:

> On Sun, 2008-08-24 at 09:54 -0400, Enrique Erne wrote:
>> Hi Jamie
>>
>> It's not much but might be helpful to port other stuff to purepd.
>>
>> you'll find
>> gt~.pd (>~)
>> lt~.pd (<~)
>> sgn~.pd
>>
>> http://www.netpd.org/eni/purepd/
>
> That's great actually, and I'd love to contribute back into this.
> However, if I'm not mistaked aren't there two purepd projects
> netpd/purepd and Hans's purepd in pd svn? Would it be worth feeding your
> patches into Hans's, and then any other abstractions I make/find I can
> also feed into svn?
>

just out of curiosity: >~.pd, <~.pd, sgn~ and what else in zexy are  
already pd-vanilla abstractions (some of them are both abstractions  
and externals for performance reasons); is there an advantage in  
collecting these things in yet another arbitrary (as opposed to  
grouped by functionality) library?

fgmasdr
IOhannes

----------------------------------------------------------------
This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.