[PD] 'pure' pd DSP abstractions wanted!

[Jamie Bullock]

On Tue, 2008-08-26 at 02:52 -0400, Enrique Erne wrote:
<snip>
> the svn purepd patches contain some abstractions that confuse me a bit. 
> actually i would like to contribute to purepd. (i.e. why is there moses 
> and clip?)

Yes, me too! Maybe H-C intends it to be a 'turtles all the way down' Pd
implementation?

> maybe we should define a purepd styleguide too. the any_argument 
> abstraction bothers me. i belive the patches could work without them and 
> i would prefer to keep it super simple.

simple++


Jamie


-- 
www.postlude.co.uk
http://www.linkedin.com/in/jamiebullock