[PD] 'pure' pd DSP abstractions wanted!
jamie at postlude.co.uk
Wed Aug 27 12:23:09 CEST 2008
On Tue, 2008-08-26 at 02:52 -0400, Enrique Erne wrote:
> the svn purepd patches contain some abstractions that confuse me a bit.
> actually i would like to contribute to purepd. (i.e. why is there moses
> and clip?)
Yes, me too! Maybe H-C intends it to be a 'turtles all the way down' Pd
> maybe we should define a purepd styleguide too. the any_argument
> abstraction bothers me. i belive the patches could work without them and
> i would prefer to keep it super simple.
More information about the Pd-list