[PD] 'pure' pd DSP abstractions wanted!
zmoelnig at iem.at
zmoelnig at iem.at
Thu Aug 28 04:09:09 CEST 2008
Quoting hard off <hard.off at gmail.com>:
> jamie, my diy collection has no licence, no need for credit., etc.. i'm
> more than happy for you to do whatever and use it.
>
each and every piece of software has a licence.
just because you haven't manually assigned a license, doesn't mean
that you have chosen the "no licence" option.
in fact, you have chosen a rather restrictive option, that protects
your copyrights.
a licence is nothing bad, esp. it is not a restriction. instead, it is
a way to declare and retract restrictions.
if you want people to be able to use your software without any
restrictions, you have to put your software under a licence that
allows them to do so.
if you want something really open, chose Public Domain.
fgmadsr
IOhannes
----------------------------------------------------------------
This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.
More information about the Pd-list
mailing list