[PD] 'pure' pd DSP abstractions wanted!

zmoelnig at iem.at zmoelnig at iem.at
Thu Aug 28 04:09:09 CEST 2008


Quoting hard off <hard.off at gmail.com>:

> jamie,   my diy collection has no licence, no need for credit., etc..  i'm
> more than happy for you to do whatever and use it.
>


each and every piece of software has a licence.
just because you haven't manually assigned a license, doesn't mean  
that you have chosen the "no licence" option.
in fact, you have chosen a rather restrictive option, that protects  
your copyrights.

a licence is nothing bad, esp. it is not a restriction. instead, it is  
a way to declare and retract restrictions.


if you want people to be able to use your software without any  
restrictions, you have to put your software under a licence that  
allows them to do so.
if you want something really open, chose Public Domain.

fgmadsr
IOhannes





----------------------------------------------------------------
This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.






More information about the Pd-list mailing list