[PD] 'pure' pd DSP abstractions wanted!
IOhannes m zmoelnig
zmoelnig at iem.at
Mon Sep 1 11:34:42 CEST 2008
Jamie Bullock wrote:
> On Thu, 2008-08-28 at 04:09 +0200, zmoelnig at iem.at wrote:
>> Quoting hard off <hard.off at gmail.com>:
>>> jamie, my diy collection has no licence, no need for credit., etc.. i'm
>>> more than happy for you to do whatever and use it.
>> each and every piece of software has a licence.
>> just because you haven't manually assigned a license, doesn't mean
>> that you have chosen the "no licence" option.
> That's true, content defaults to 'all rights reserved' by the copyright
> holder -- the content author unless a license is supplied explicitly .
> However, by emailing me and writing "jamie, my diy collection has no
> licence, no need for credit., etc.. i'm more than happy for you to do
> whatever and use it." hard off is effectively supplying a license to me
> to use the software to do whatever I like.
definitely; i just wanted to make sure that people know that they have
to make their wish to share explicit in order to make it all work.
it's a system of distrust, but its the system we live in.
More information about the Pd-list