[PD] execution order for ~ objects that output messages

[Damian Stewart]

IOhannes m zmölnig wrote:

> but of course you proposal to use another source for synching the
> outputs is the way to go.

yeah, i kind of realised this one as well...

hm. are all the [~] objects going to trigger before or after all the 
message-rate objects? is that much defined? or could there be interleaved 
[~] and message-rate object firings? eg an [env~] fires before a [* ] which 
is then followed by another [env~]?

d

-- 
damian stewart | skype: damiansnz | damian at frey.co.nz
frey | live art with machines | http://www.frey.co.nz