[PD] execution order for ~ objects that output messages

[IOhannes m zmölnig]

Damian Stewart wrote:
> IOhannes m zmölnig wrote:
> 
>> now, signal-to-message objects _should_ accept this scheduling, by *not*
>> sending messages in the dsp callback, but rather schedule them to the
>> next tick (via a "[delay 0]")
>> afaik all _internal_ objects adhere to this.
> 
> hm, again.. so, at what point do these invisible '[delay 0]' objects
> output their messages? do they end up at the 'head' or the 'tail' (so to
> speak) of the 'message avalanche'? or are they somewhere in the middle?
> 

at the head

gmadsr
IOhannes