[PD] d-median (a running median) + d-for (a for loop)
fbar at footils.org
Fri Oct 17 17:25:46 CEST 2008
Damian Stewart hat gesagt: // Damian Stewart wrote:
> personally i find sends and receives to be a mixed blessing. on the one
> hand they get rid of unnecessary patch cords, but on the other hand they
> make it much less clear to see what's going on with the execution order.
> (what happens to the execution order when you do a message send/receive,
Nothing. The execution order is not affected by sends and receives.
I didn't change that much actually: I only introduced three or four
sends like for current position and for the new value, also I changed
the backwards stop connections into a send "$0-stop". But of course it's
confusing for you now as you've been into the old version a lot deeper
that I was. I also replaced many fanning connections because they make
me nervous. ;) I also left-aligned almost everything for clarity.
Normally I like it if there are lots of verbosely named subpatches when
dealing with a complicated algorithm, i.e.:
I wanted to make the patch clearer by separating stuff into more
subpatches like this, but then I broke it. :(
More information about the Pd-list