[PD] Scope of [block~] and [switch~]

[David F. Place]

On Mon, 2008-10-20 at 15:50 +0200, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
> the warning is misleading though: Pd simply refuses to
> [throw~]/[catch~] 
> or [s~]/[r~] with anything other than the standard 64-sample, 
> no-overlap, no-resampling signal.
> 

I see. I changed all of my throws and catches to direct connections and
it now works, sort of.  My patches are much uglier, though.