[PD] block~ vs. freeverb~

[David F. Place]

On Mon, 2008-10-20 at 20:52 +0200, Derek Holzer wrote:
> My guess is that [freeverb~] calculates the decay time in 
> samples somehow, thus the very short reverb times at very fast
> sampling 
> rates. Alternately, move [freeverb~] out of the upsampled subptach,
> it's 
> probably eating tons of CPU by being there anyways.

Looking at the source code for freeverb~.c, it seems the comb filters
are hand tuned assuming a 44.1kHz sample rate.  So...freeverb and
upsampling don't mix.

Cheers,
David