[PD] available objects in pd extended

[Lao Yu]

Derek,

I understand that and as pd is still evolving there is nothing wrong  
or strange about the 'moving target' tag - I'm not even complaining.  
My thought is, there must be someone who decides to include or not to  
include a specific external / abstraction in a specific extended  
version. For the users it would then be an 'easy thing' to identify  
if an external is available in that release or not. I also have the  
impression that there are in fact in number of libraries that are  
constantly included in the extended version and that evolve little or  
slower than the extended releases. -- Anyway, just a thought.
And thanks for the link to floss manuals, very useful.

Best
Jurgen

On Nov 1, 2008, at 8:17 PM, Derek Holzer wrote:

> Hi Jurgen,
>
> this list has been described as a "moving target" here before. It
> changes quite frequently, and part of the Extended strategy is that  
> the
> whole distribution is automatically generated from SVN, so unless  
> there
> was a function somewhere to add the contents of a library to a list it
> would be very hard to maintain. The next best thing is to look through
> 5.reference at the libs available.
>
> If anyone wants to help update a manual list of the Extended objects,
> you can add to the Pd FLOSS Manual:
>
> http://en.flossmanuals.net/PureData/ListofObjects
>
> The Pdpedia was also a good resource for this, however it's been  
> offline
> for more than a year I think.
>
> best,
> Derek
>
> Lao Yu wrote:
>
>> it would be a good idea to create a list of available objects in the
>> extended version
>
> -- 
> Derek Holzer
> http://www.umatic.nl
> http://blog.myspace.com/macumbista
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pd-list at iem.at mailing list
> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/ 
> listinfo/pd-list