[PD] hot and cold inlets don't always make sense

[Martin Schied]

Hi,

look at the attachment, using [t b f] should be the easiest way doing 
it. Using no graphical bangs is also better for performance. The trigger 
object [t  b f] or [trigger bang float] makes clear in which order your 
events are sent, contrary to the two graphical connections where you 
afterwards can't see the order in which they where patched. Have a look 
at help patch for more info...

PS: holding shift while modifying values in numboxes you also get (a 
predefined) fine tuning.

regards,
Martin
 

Lao Yu wrote:
> Hi,
>
> when using an [+] object I find it most of the time counterproductive 
> that the right inlet is considered cold.
>
> for example, if I want to use 2 different controls for 'coarse' and 
> 'fine' tuning parameters it is necessary to add them together. however 
> when changing 'fine' value which for instance is connected to the 
> right inlet the new value is only taken into consideration once the 
> 'coarse' value connected to the left inlet is changed as well.
>
> the only workaround I found was to [bang] the hot inlet form the cold 
> one as illustrated in the attached patch. but I don't find that elegant.
>
> is there a better way to make both inlets hot?
>
> Best
> Jurgen
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pd-list at iem.at mailing list
> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
>   

-------------- next part --------------
An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed...
Name: add_both_hot.pd
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/attachments/20081121/9724de44/attachment.txt>