[PD] Pd exam 02: complete a longer list [was: Pd exam 01]

Mike McGonagle mjmogo at gmail.com
Wed Nov 26 10:25:35 CET 2008


Ah, thanks for the explanation...

Mike

On 11/26/08, Thomas Grill <gr at grrrr.org> wrote:
>
>  Am 26.11.2008 um 09:20 schrieb Mike McGonagle:
>
>
> > On 11/26/08, Thomas Grill <gr at grrrr.org> wrote:
> >
> > > hmmm, how about
> > >
> > > [inlet]
> > > |
> > > [t a       b]
> > > |       /  |  \
> > > |   [200] [300] [400]
> > > |       |   |   |
> > > [pack 0 0   0   0]
> > > |
> > > [outlet]
> > >
> > >
> > > It's a pity that pack is not settable...
> > >
> >
> > If I understand you correctly on this, Thomas, if it were "settable",
> > wouldn't each use of that [pack] reset the values that it would use
> > for the defaults? I thought that was the whole point of the problem?
> >
>
>  i meant that if one could use a [set 0 200 300 400( message for pack, that
> would be shorter than three individual default numbers 200,300,400.
>  gr~~~
>
>


-- 
Peace may sound simple—one beautiful word— but it requires everything
we have, every quality, every strength, every dream, every high ideal.
—Yehudi Menuhin (1916–1999), musician




More information about the Pd-list mailing list