[PD] Pd exam 02: complete a longer list [was: Pd exam 01]

[Matt Barber]

I think maybe problems of this form need at most three objects, and
two if you could do
[t 200 300 400 ...].

-------------------------------------------------
[inlet]
 |      ________________
 |      |                                   |
 |     [200 300 400{            |
 |       |                                  |
 |     [unpack 0 0 0]            |
 |        |     |     |                     |
[pack 0 200 300 400]      |
 | \_________________|
 |
[outlet]

----------------------------------------------------

the outlet of the [pack] is connected to [200 300 400{  message as
well as the [outlet], in case the ascii didn't turn out well or was
ambiguous.

No trigger is necessary in this scenario since the order of operations
does not matter in this instance (though it might be better form/style
to reset the [pack] in the subpatch before sending the output, and
might be necessary if this were meant as an abstraction, where it
could be used in recursive loops).


However, I think Michal Seta's solution is a lot more scalable --
attached is a patch that shows what I mean.


Matt


> Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2008 10:52:09 +0100
> From: Frank Barknecht <fbar at footils.org>
> Subject: Re: [PD] Pd exam 02: complete a longer list [was: Pd exam 01]
> To: pd-list at iem.at
> Message-ID: <20081126095208.GB18764 at fliwatut.scifi>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>
> Hallo,
> Michal Seta hat gesagt: // Michal Seta wrote:
>
>> Sorry, missed all the points on the first assignment.
>> Here's my contribution.
>
> I think, yours is a pretty cool, original and elegant solution!
>
> Ciao
> --
>  Frank Barknecht            Do You RjDj.me?          _ ______footils.org__
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed...
Name: Frank_test2a.pd
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/attachments/20081126/39a21a6f/attachment.asc>