[PD] Pd exam 02: complete a longer list [was: Pd exam 01]

Jack jack at rybn.org
Wed Nov 26 16:00:00 CET 2008


Yep ! it's good ! ;)
I needn't my [unpack] before [pack], it's a mistake !
So here with a [t a b].
++

Jack

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: pd-exam-02c.pd
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 943 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/attachments/20081126/89f94d9d/attachment.obj>
-------------- next part --------------

Le 26 nov. 08 ? 15:28, Matt Barber a ?crit :

> I think maybe problems of this form need at most three objects, and
> two if you could do
> [t 200 300 400 ...].
>
> -------------------------------------------------
> [inlet]
>  |      ________________
>  |      |                                   |
>  |     [200 300 400{            |
>  |       |                                  |
>  |     [unpack 0 0 0]            |
>  |        |     |     |                     |
> [pack 0 200 300 400]      |
>  | \_________________|
>  |
> [outlet]
>
> ----------------------------------------------------
>
> the outlet of the [pack] is connected to [200 300 400{  message as
> well as the [outlet], in case the ascii didn't turn out well or was
> ambiguous.
>
> No trigger is necessary in this scenario since the order of operations
> does not matter in this instance (though it might be better form/style
> to reset the [pack] in the subpatch before sending the output, and
> might be necessary if this were meant as an abstraction, where it
> could be used in recursive loops).
>
>
> However, I think Michal Seta's solution is a lot more scalable --
> attached is a patch that shows what I mean.
>
>
> Matt
>
>
>> Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2008 10:52:09 +0100
>> From: Frank Barknecht <fbar at footils.org>
>> Subject: Re: [PD] Pd exam 02: complete a longer list [was: Pd exam  
>> 01]
>> To: pd-list at iem.at
>> Message-ID: <20081126095208.GB18764 at fliwatut.scifi>
>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>>
>> Hallo,
>> Michal Seta hat gesagt: // Michal Seta wrote:
>>
>>> Sorry, missed all the points on the first assignment.
>>> Here's my contribution.
>>
>> I think, yours is a pretty cool, original and elegant solution!
>>
>> Ciao
>> --
>>  Frank Barknecht            Do You RjDj.me?          _  
>> ______footils.org__
>>
>>
>> <Frank_test2a.pd>
> _______________________________________________
> Pd-list at iem.at mailing list
> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/ 
> listinfo/pd-list



More information about the Pd-list mailing list