[PD] beginnings of 'framesync' library
Hans-Christoph Steiner
hans at eds.org
Wed Dec 3 21:21:11 CET 2008
On Dec 3, 2008, at 11:38 AM, IOhannes m zmölnig wrote:
> patrick wrote:
>> hi hans,
>>
>> i know almost nothing about pd svn, but i was looking at framesync
>> and
>> there is no external (.pd_linux, .pd_darwin, .dll).
>
> no generated file (e.g. binaries which are generated by compiling
> source-code) should ever be under version control.
>
>> should it be in
>> abstractions instead?
>>
>
> i think on the long run all ./abstractions should be moved to ./
> externals
> i did not do it yet because i haven't taken the time yet, to ask the
> relevant authors whether this would be fine for them.
My thoughts exactly... but I don't think it is worth it to just move
'abstractions' to 'externals'. We should probably have a more
comprehensive reorg. Yeah, it does seem to be political...
.hc
>
> fgmadr
> IOhannes
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pd-list at iem.at mailing list
> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/
> listinfo/pd-list
------------------------------------------------------------------------
----
If you are not part of the solution, you are part of the problem.
More information about the Pd-list
mailing list