[PD] beginnings of 'framesync' library

Hans-Christoph Steiner hans at eds.org
Wed Dec 3 21:21:11 CET 2008


On Dec 3, 2008, at 11:38 AM, IOhannes m zmölnig wrote:

> patrick wrote:
>> hi hans,
>>
>> i know almost nothing about pd svn, but i was looking at framesync  
>> and
>> there is no external (.pd_linux, .pd_darwin, .dll).
>
> no generated file (e.g. binaries which are generated by compiling
> source-code) should ever be under version control.
>
>> should it be in
>> abstractions instead?
>>
>
> i think on the long run all ./abstractions should be moved to ./ 
> externals
> i did not do it yet because i haven't taken the time yet, to ask the
> relevant authors whether this would be fine for them.

My thoughts exactly...  but I don't think it is worth it to just move  
'abstractions' to 'externals'.  We should probably have a more  
comprehensive reorg.  Yeah, it does seem to be political...

.hc

>
> fgmadr
> IOhannes
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pd-list at iem.at mailing list
> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/ 
> listinfo/pd-list



------------------------------------------------------------------------ 
----

If you are not part of the solution, you are part of the problem.






More information about the Pd-list mailing list