[PD] A fake >~ without expr

[Hans-Christoph Steiner]

On Dec 5, 2008, at 1:46 PM, Frank Barknecht wrote:

> Hallo,
> Enrique Erne hat gesagt: // Enrique Erne wrote:
>
>> Frank Barknecht wrote:
>>> Ah, these are even better. Do you mind if I use them in such a  
>>> way as
>>> putting them into the purepd folder of the subversion? ;)
>>
>> that would be great frank!
>
> Okay, I added them now to trunk/abstractions/purepd
>
> I made a little change in that I added second inlets to both gt~ and
> lt~ to overwrite the argument.
>
> Additionally I added [gt2~] and [lt2~] variations at the same place
> which compare 2 signals. They don't accept an argument anymore
> however.

Are these the fake versions?  Within purepd, I don't think that the  
fake >~ should be named gt~/lt~ is they are not numerically accurate  
copies of the real >~ <~.  The idea of the purepd is that they are  
exact clones of objects written in Pd.  I don't think that library  
should be a place for "close enough" clones, unless they are clearly  
named.

.hc

>
> Ciao
> -- 
>  Frank Barknecht            Do You RjDj.me?          _  
> ______footils.org__
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pd-list at iem.at mailing list
> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/ 
> listinfo/pd-list




------------------------------------------------------------------------ 
----

All mankind is of one author, and is one volume; when one man dies,  
one chapter is not torn out of the book, but translated into a better  
language; and every chapter must be so translated.... -John Donne