[PD] A fake >~ without expr

[Frank Barknecht]

Hallo,
Hans-Christoph Steiner hat gesagt: // Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:

> Are these the fake versions?  Within purepd, I don't think that the  
> fake >~ should be named gt~/lt~ is they are not numerically accurate  
> copies of the real >~ <~.  The idea of the purepd is that they are  
> exact clones of objects written in Pd.  I don't think that library  
> should be a place for "close enough" clones, unless they are clearly  
> named.

These are Enrique's versions, which are the same as the versions in
Zexy, except that Zexy's [>~] changes its second inlet from being a
signal inlet to a message inlet when you provide an argument. That's not
possible to do with an abstraction, so I added two versions. 

Ciao
-- 
Frank