[PD] tracking down segfault in dssi~

Jamie Bullock jamie at postlude.co.uk
Sun Dec 14 20:28:16 CET 2008


On Sun, 2008-12-14 at 13:12 -0500, Ivica Ico Bukvic wrote:
> > Basically the plugin search function LADSPAPluginSearch() will open
> > every file in your search path. If it is a library (of any sort) it will
> > look for the symbols "ladspa_descriptor" or "dssi_descriptor" inside it.
> > If one of these gets found, the callback function
> > dssi_tilde_search_plugin_callback()  is invoked. This iterates over the
> > plugins in the library by repeatedly calling the Plugin's descriptor
> > function until a match is found against the plugin search string
> > provided as an argument to dssi~. A potential crash situation could
> > occur if the symbol "dssi_descriptor" is exported by the plugin library,
> > but the descriptor function doesn't return a pointer to a valid
> > DSSI_Descriptor struct...

> Many thanks for the info Jamie. One quick question before I embark on the
> search for the potentially problematic plugin: if I run listplugins command
> line tool that comes with ladspa sdk I get no segfaults or errors other than
> "no more csLADSPA plugins" at the end. Is this indicative of anything or is
> this orthogonal to the way how dssi~ objects cycles through plugins?
> 

It could point the problem being in a DSSI plugin since the
'listplugins' CLI only lists LADSPAs. 

What happens when you send the 'listplugins' message to [dssi~]. This
passes a different callback to LADSPAPluginSearch(), so *might* yield a
non-crash.

Jamie

-- 
www.postlude.co.uk
http://www.linkedin.com/in/jamiebullock






More information about the Pd-list mailing list