[PD] trying to figure out limiter~ (zexy)

[Kyle Klipowicz]

Sweet info. Nice to learn a tad more on how limiters work on the back end.

~Kyle

On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 6:04 AM, IOhannes m zmoelnig <zmoelnig at iem.at>wrote:

> Thomas Mayer wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>
>  |               \
>> [limiter~]      [z~ 64]
>> |               /
>>
>
> and for those who are wondering: the [z~ 64] is there to compensate for the
> delay that is built into [limiter~].
> [limiter~] does a bit of upsampling which requires a delay, so the
> gain-signal is a bit late.
> the precise amount is 9 samples (iirc), but might as well be dynamic
> (depending on the buffer-size you give). "64" samples is just a bit longer
> so clicks should be masked by psychoacoustic effects.
>
> fgmasdr
> IOhannes
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pd-list at iem.at mailing list
> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
>
>


-- 
-----
------------
   ----     -----
---- -------- - ------
http://perhapsidid.wordpress.com
http://myspace.com/kyleklipowicz
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/attachments/20081226/7abe751c/attachment.htm>