[PD] Ubuntu vs. ubuntustudio?

altern altern2 at gmail.com
Sun Jan 4 09:52:38 CET 2009

PSPunch(e)k dio:
>> What do you think might be the better approach, to use ubuntu normal, or  
>> ubuntustudio? Roman told me that for a while there's no big difference,  
>> because the -rt kernel comes with ubuntu. Is ubuntustudio more than a  
>> bundle of software with nice backgrounds? (Note: I'll use the same setup  
>> on both computers, so the system should work on 64 and 32b).
> As far as I know, "Studio" is just plain Ubuntu that comes with a set of 
> software relevant to audio & video.
> As a matter of fact, installing the "studio (or a name of that sort)" 
> meta package on plain Ubuntu is the same as starting out with a "studio" 
> installation CD/DVD.
> Probably it is just the matter of preference in images used for the 
> startup screen and the default wall paper.

i think there is something else than just the kernel and packages. some 
tweaks on the configuration that the plain Ubuntu does not have, stuff 
like memory use, priorities and groups + permissions. But i think all 
can be done by hand.


More information about the Pd-list mailing list