[PD] PD extended very slow loading patches
Hans-Christoph Steiner
hans at eds.org
Fri Jan 9 19:41:07 CET 2009
With Pd-extended 0.39.3, the libdir code was compiled in as part of
it. A library could also be loaded using [declare] or [import].
It is possible there is a bug in the libdir code, but it is something
that I have never seen, so I can't troubleshoot it. If you can make a
patch that reproduces the problem every time, then post it and I'll
have a look.
.hc
On Jan 9, 2009, at 3:33 AM, kristof lauwers wrote:
> Strange. I tried extended 0.40.3 with only libdir and no other
> libraries (removed them from the registry) and it was still so
> slow. But with 0.39.3 and all of its default libraries my patches
> load in a couple of seconds.. but i don't see libdir in 0.39.3's pd-
> settings.reg also..
>
>
> xof
>
>
> At 01:45 2009-01-09, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
>
>
>> I haven't heard of libdir causing problems, its been around since
>> 0.38. I am guessing that the problem is in one of the ilbraries that
>> is loaded after libdir is. Then if you don't load libdir, that
>> library doesn't get loaded.
>>
>> 'libdir' is support for the libdir library format.
>>
>> .hc
>>
>> On Jan 8, 2009, at 5:19 AM, kristof lauwers wrote:
>>
>>> At 01:57 2009-01-08, Hans wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> My guess is that it is due to the hexloader. Are you loading that?
>>>> There was quite a bit of discussion about it in the past.
>>>
>>> I was not loading the hexloader, but it seems libdir is the culprit
>>> (or is this the same? - i've been reading some stuff in the
>>> archives,
>>> but i find it quite confusing and might be missing some bits).
>>> When i remove all other libraries except libdir from startup, the
>>> patches still load so slow. when i remove just libdir, they open
>>> immediately, but then the other externals don't get loaded
>>> automatically anymore..
>>> i can live with it that way, but it ould be nice if it worked some
>>> time in the future..
>>> xof
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> .hc
>>>>
>>>> On Jan 7, 2009, at 9:44 AM, kristof lauwers wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> hi,
>>>>> I just tried PD extended 0.40.3. While none of my patches takes
>>>>> longer then a couple of seconds to load in vanilla pd, extended
>>>>> takes
>>>>> sometimes (especialy with patches that contain a lot of gop
>>>>> abstractions) several minutes, eating 50% of my cpu.
>>>>> I tried it on two computers (both on WinXp) and had the same
>>>>> problem
>>>>> on both..
>>>>> Any idea where the slowness come from and how i can get rid of
>>>>> it?
>>>>> thanks,
>>>>> Kristof
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> ____________________________________
>>>>>
>>>>> info at kristoflauwers.domainepublic.net
>>>>>
>>>>> http://kristoflauwers.domainepublic.net
>>>>> http://myspace.com/xofxof
>>>>> ____________________________________
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Pd-list at iem.at mailing list
>>>>> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
>>>>> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Pd-list at iem.at mailing list
>>> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
>>
More information about the Pd-list
mailing list