[PD] [PD-announce] Gem 0.91-2 bugfix release
IOhannes m zmoelnig
zmoelnig at iem.at
Wed Jan 21 18:39:13 CET 2009
Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
> Yeah, you need to compile on 10.4 to make it 10.4 compatible. It should
> also be possible to use -isysroot to compile for 10.4 on 10.5 if you
> want to try that.
the isysroot seems to work ok so far.
> About .d_fat, I think it is probably best to avoid that. .pd_darwin
> works well with fat/universal binaries and will cause much less
> confusion. I don't think .d_fat been used anywhere except for 4
> objectclasses in extra. I have been using .pd_darwin universal
> binaries, and Thomas Grill has as well.
do i understand correctly, that there is no real argument against d_fat
in the above?
btw, most universal binaries maintained by thomas musil are d_fat.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 3636 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
More information about the Pd-list