[PD] d_fat vs. pd_darwin (was Re: Gem 0.91-2 bugfix release)
IOhannes m zmoelnig
zmoelnig at iem.at
Thu Jan 22 20:39:19 CET 2009
Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
> On Jan 22, 2009, at 4:12 AM, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
> Lots of people have been doing network shares of applications for
> decades. Who else is using custom file extensions? I've never seen
python, java, ...
> it. NeXTSTEP/Mac OS X has been doing this since '94, and their
> solution has been fat binaries all with the same extension. That is
> what universal binaries are today. It's proven to work well.
ok: here is a feature request for fat binaries including linux (i386,
x86_64) and windows (i386) binaries.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 3636 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
More information about the Pd-list