[PD] [PD-announce] Gem 0.91-2 bugfix release

Hans-Christoph Steiner hans at eds.org
Tue Jan 27 00:08:23 CET 2009

On Jan 26, 2009, at 11:05 AM, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:

> Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
>> On Jan 19, 2009, at 5:04 AM, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
>>> IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
>>>> i just put a bugfix release of Gem-0.91 online.
>>>> or svn checkout from
>>>> - https://pd-gem.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/pd-gem/tags/0.91-2/
>>> having said that, it would be nice that any autobuilds that   
>>> explicitely use 0.91(0,1) should be updated to use 0.91-2
>>> fgasm,dr
>>> IOhannes
>> I think the 'pd-extended' auto-build uses trunk for everything but   
>> 'pd', which uses the 'pd-extended/0.41.4' branch.  Once I make the   
>> release cycle (soon), I'll make a branch of everything.  Should I  
>> use  that version of Gem for the release branch?
> did you already do the switch (libmpeg3 build errors popped up again)?
> i just realized it would be better to use https://pd-gem.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/pd-gem/branches/0.91/
> since this one will eventually get even more bugfixes (and as a  
> matter of fact already has some more in it: 0.91.3; though the  
> libmpeg3 issue has probably not been backported yet)
> fgmasdr
> IOhannes

The pd-extended nightly build is indeed using the branch, not the tag:



                             kill your television

More information about the Pd-list mailing list