[PD] Why I don't like the new automagic
IOhannes m zmoelnig
zmoelnig at iem.at
Thu Jan 29 09:56:29 CET 2009
IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
>
> well i guess this is the main problem with how Pd does it right now.
which was not meant to be defeatist.
i have no objection (so far :-)) basically on _what_ is communicated
between Pd nd Pd-gui. e.g. i don't have any real problems with the
server handling mouse-movements and keystrokes (this made peerdata work,
after all).
what i would love is, if a simple move (using cursor-keys) of a slected
objects would not result in:
> pdtk_undomenu .x9f74bf0 motion no
> .x9f74bf0.c move .x9f74bf0.t9f79510 0 1
> .x9f74bf0.c coords .x9f74bf0.t9f79510R 252 117 277 117 277 134 252
134 252 117
> .x9f74bf0.c itemconfigure .x9f74bf0.t9f79510R -dash ""
> .x9f74bf0.c coords .x9f74bf0.t9f79510o0 252 133 259 134
> .x9f74bf0.c coords .x9f74bf0.t9f79510i0 252 117 259 118
> .x9f74bf0.c coords .x9f74bf0.t9f79510i1 270 117 277 118
but rather
> pdtk_undomenu <winID> motion no;
> <objID> move 0 1;
(with winID being something like x9f74bf0, and objID being e.g. 9f79510)
nothing more is needed.
i just don't want to see _any_ tcl/tk code in _any_ C-file.
fmgasdr
IOhannes
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature
Size: 3636 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/attachments/20090129/c5627008/attachment.bin>
More information about the Pd-list
mailing list