[PD] strange wave

[Hans Roels]

thanks a lot for this information, I added the  [loadbang]->[; pd dsp 
0; pd dsp 1(  to my recording abstraction and after testing it a few 
times, this seems more reliable.
Hans r

At 12:40 3/03/2009, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
>Hans Roels wrote:
>>I think/hope that I managed to isolate the problem with writesf~ 
>>and readsf~. There are two patches in attach that print out every 
>>step that you take so one can't forget to click 'open' for example, 
>>it also measures the time between the 'open' and 'start' command. 
>>Copy these 2 patches in the same folder.
>
>the answer is simple: there is a (known) bug in Pd that does not 
>re-start the dsp-graph in some situations when live-patching.
>i think there is at least 1 bug-report in the sf bug-tracker.
>
>so what happens here is: after you have started the dsp you create 
>[rec] but for whatever reasons, the dsp-graph is not updated and 
>thus your [writesf~] is not working at all.
>
>you can test this by:
>adding [env~] plust floatatom to [osc~] in your [rec] patch. save it.
>then re-start Pd, open main.pd, create [rec], open it up and 
>lo-and-behold, the numberbox might still show 0 (and is not updated by [env~])
>
>workaround: manually restart the dsp after you have dynamically 
>created an object: [loadbang]->[; pd dsp 0; pd dsp 1(
>
>
>fgnmasdr
>IOhannes
>
>